Joe Scarborough Is Dead Wrong on Sarah Palin

If it’s not a liberal perpetuating and spewing slanderous anti-Palin diatribes, it’s an old-tier Republican altogether dismissing her as “inept” and/or “unqualified”.  While both sides have their reasons for opposing Sarah Palin’s existence – let alone her stature in the American political schema – their attacks have extended beyond the realm of reason.  Most recently, Joe Scarborough delved into the Palin debate, with his half-witted Politico column proving to be little more than a mirror reflection of the left’s consistently unfair and imbalanced anti-Palin commentary. Scarborough begins his Politico piece by calling Palin a major problem for the GOP, denigrating her as a mere “reality show star” and insinuating that she simply “cannot be elected”.  It’s tough to pick a starting point, but allow be to commence with Scarborough’s assertion that Palin is a “problem” for the GOP.  First and foremost, why is it such a horrific prospect for Palin to be the “most talked about” figure in the conservative movement?  If anything, her star-power has served as a positive force for a number of conservative candidates.  When Palin shows up, thousands of people rally and the monies flow in.

So, what’s the issue?  Is Palin really that much of a problem for the GOP?  Clearly, Scarborough is petrified at the prospect of a Palin White House run in 2012, but dismissing her as a mere “problem” fails to recognize the absolute benefit she serves as a promoter, mouthpiece and fundraising machine for right-leaning candidates.

In terms of Scarborough’s assertion that Palin is not a viable candidate, let’s remember that there have been plenty of people throughout history who’ve been deemed “unelectable” and they’ve shown critics up.  In the end, who’s to say whether Palin is or is not “electable”?  That’s a decision the American people will have to make if and when the time comes.

Later in the piece, Scarborough (clearly overtaken with sarcasm), writes, “Maybe the publishing world’s favorite reality star can keep drawing attention and selling billions of books by spitting on John Wayne’s grave or “manning up” by shooting an American bald eagle.”  He goes on to continue referring to Palin as a “reality star”, as though her time in government was a figment in the minds of Alaskans – and Americans, for that matter.  But, that’s beside the point.

Scarborough is so interested in insulting Palin that he omits basic truths and acts as though Palin has been a do-nothing buffoon.  He dismisses her resume as “thin” and rants on with the same vitriol one would expect to hear from a career politician railing against an opposing candidate.  To his credit, Scarborough writes, “Sarah Palin is not a stupid woman.”  But, again, moments of factual clarity are rare in the piece.

Love Palin or hate her, she is only the second woman in American history to campaign for the vice-presidency.  She certainly made history and her most notable achievement had nothing to do with reality television.  Stringing together a slew of insults that serve as little more than obnoxiously child-like pokes at a figure who has – like it or not – proven herself larger than life does nothing of real value to our democracy (nor does it make a viable case against Palin’s political force).

In a fit of irony Scarborough questions, “What man or mouse with a fully functioning human brain and a résumé as thin as Palin’s would flirt with a presidential run?”  Do the words “Barack Obama” ring a bell?  Surely they do, though Scarborough sees Obama as vastly more qualified going into the presidency than Palin would be, should she run (another absurd insinuation).  I’m by no means stating that I believe Palin should be president in 2012 (or beyond), but I am reaffirming her right to – at the least – run for the presidency.  This is America, isn’t it?  And even if she doesn’t run, dismissing her as a “problem” and acting as though her impact and viability are non-factors is intellectually dishonest and just plain silly.  “Sarah Palin is stupid and/or unqualified” has become liberal code for “I disagree with her belief system” and conservative code for “I’m jealous of her charisma.”  Get over it, people.

Scarborough’s concentrated insidiousness seems so over-the-top and uncalled for it’s a wonder anyone advising him would have recommended he publish it.  Then again, judging from works produced by the other personalities over at MSNBC, this may be the most conservative piece of “journalism” to spew from the network in years.  Perhaps we should be counting our blessings?

Entertainment Media Find Any Excuse to Blast Sarah Pali

The entertainment media’s treatment of Sarah Palin and her family has been abhorrent.  Like their biased and unjust hard news media brethren, entertainment outlets have gone out of their way to tarnish Palin’s image.  While tabloids, semi-legitimate entertainment programs and celebrities issue incessant praise for President Obama and his leftist policies, Palin is showered with insults and inappropriate slurs. And let’s not forget the ongoing insensitive questioning about the birth of her special needs son, Trig.

Since the end of the 2008 campaign, some of the most glaring examples of the entertainment media’s obsession with anti-Palin coverage have centered on Levi Johnston, the father of Bristol Palin’s baby.  Levi, a guy who would be better suited to appear on Tool Academy than he would on any legitimate hard or entertainment news program, has been reaping the benefits from his connection to Palin.  In addition to his highly-publicized Playgirl shoot, Levi has been circulating entertainment shows in an attempt to pass off his melba-esque persona as something less than bland.

And, surprise!  Since breaking up with Bristol, Levi has had a more-than-warm welcome from entertainment media who are anxious to find dirt on the former Alaska governor.  While there is no contestant shortage for 2009’s “Most Idiotic Entertainment News Outlet” category, CBS’s The Insidertakes the cake.  Described as a program that “…reports on the dynamic world of breaking celebrity news and offers viewers opposing views on everything …Hollywood!” The Insider touts coverage that is a half-step above highlighting a covert meeting between President Obama and friendly extraterrestrials. 

This begs the question: Since when is Sarah Palin “Hollywood?”  One could argue that it all started with Kathy Griffin’s antics. In what commenced as yet another plea for attention, Griffin brought Levi toThe 2009 Teen Choice Awards.  Clearly, this was little more than a publicity stunt for Griffin, who would likely sell her left kidney if it yielded a decent photo-op.  However, in the grander scheme, this was a clear statement to young people: Go ahead and laugh at Sarah Palin.  Hollywood’s doing it, so you should too! 

For what other purposes would it be appropriate to elevate and promote Levi for all of young America to see if not to embarrass a Republican politician?  Of course, Griffin garnered the attention she wanted and Levi was portrayed as a bizarro teen heart throb of sorts.  You know you’re in Hollywood when…[insert moment of inhumanity and/or insanity].  The Huffington Post penned the play-by-play back in August:

“Dressed in a pinstripe suit and pink striped tie, the Alaskan teen and father of Sarah Palin’s grandson Tripp arrived hand-in-hand with Griffin, planted a kiss on her cheek for the cameras and did some solo posing as well.”

Gag me. 

Anyway, let’s move back to 2009 champion of idiocy: The Insider.  This fall, the show decided to reunite Levi and Griffin.  During what host Lara Spencer probably mistook as a very riveting and thought-provoking interview, she asked Levi fair-minded questions in the vein of, “Is Sarah Palin really Trig’s mother?” and “Why do you think Sarah Palin is afraid of you?”  Following the liberally-driven wingnuttery that ensued during the 2008 presidential campaign, the question about Trig’s birth is breathtakingly cruel and sense-retardant.  Spencer’s questioning screamed ratings desperation and showed just how far entertainment media will go to make Palin look idiotic while turning a profit. 

Now, let’s jump to Andrew Sullivan’s recent appearance on Joy Behar’s HLN show.  According to Sullivan,

“I don`t think [Palin] has much relationship with reality…And I think at some point, if journalists do their job and if brave people stand up and tell the truth, we will find out who Sarah Palin really is. And we currently don`t know.”

These would be the same journalists who did such an excellent job researching the man who currently leads the free world.  Insane.  And here, too, the story about Trig’s birth is brought into question.  Detached from reality?  Maybe Sullivan should explore the mental capacity of his interviewer.  After all, who can ignore Behar’s detached-from-reality commentary about people who favor Sarah Palin:

“Well her people are evil and nasty. They are not nice people. They send me nasty mail and everybody else who talks about it. Anything negative about Sarah Palin, they get hit with this stuff. You know.”

Ironic that Behar wouldn’t consider her own nastiness as a potential catalyst for negative feedback. Behar has openly called Palin stupid, among other nasally-delivered complements.  And the list goes on and on.  The entertainment media (which, by my calculation, includes the now theoretically deficient Andrew Sullivan) are intent on making Palin out to be: stupid, evil, incompetent, a mere “Barbie” and insolent, in no particular order.

Get over it, Hollywood.  Sarah Palin doesn’t share your values.  She’s pro-life, pro-capitalism and pro-rationality.  Rather than wasting all of your time lambasting her, promoting Levi and attempting to debunk her very existence, why not divert even a portion of your energy towards examining the man you’ve placed America’s very existence in the hands of.  We’ve all got personal dirt.  Since you’ll never let up, why not shovel a little less of Palin’s and a little more of Obama’s?

A little fair-mindedness is all we’re asking for.  Can you deliver?

"The Scorekeeper" on Red County!

I have officially joined forces for a new podcast with!  Yesterday, we released the second episode of "The Scorekeeper." As host, I focus on the GOP's winner and loser of the week.  There can only be one on each side, so the competition is tough.  But, if we're going to talk about renewing the party, we have to delve deep to find the heroes who will help us progress and the zeros who are dragging us down!

Aside from my new weekly show (available every Monday), be sure to check out Red County's new, slick design, great content and the other four shows that come from some great conservative minds!  Click here to check out "The Scorekeeper" or surf over the Red County's main page.